fnmatch/regex in uClibc
Peter S. Mazinger
ps.m at gmx.net
Sat Dec 24 00:26:54 UTC 2005
On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 10:06:13PM +0100, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 09:40:24PM +0100, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > > > On Fri, 23 Dec 2005, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > > > On Fri, Dec 23, 2005 at 12:37:07AM +0100, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > > > > > Should I add it (as regex) with option to use old version?
> > > > >
> > > > > i would make fnmatch a suboption of new regex and not bother with old
> > > > > regex
> > > >
> > > > Why suboption of regex? they are not really dependant..
> > >
> > > your original e-mail made it sound like they were
> >
> > I have meant only how I added the new regex code, having old and new, they
> > are really unrelated
>
> oh, so we'd have a fnmatch and fnmatch_old
>
> seems like a sane way to move forward to me ... also, fnmatch() isnt
> currently an option under 'Big and Tall' ... seems like we should add
> one eh ?
> -mike
Added option for it, both old and new are within Big and Tall
Peter
--
Peter S. Mazinger <ps dot m at gmx dot net> ID: 0xA5F059F2
Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08 BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2
More information about the uClibc
mailing list