gcc version for kernel compilation

Mike Frysinger vapier at gentoo.org
Fri Dec 16 14:47:32 UTC 2005


On Fri, Dec 16, 2005 at 11:09:40AM +0100, Jan-Benedict Glaw wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-12-16 09:56:10 +0000, Will Newton <will.newton at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 12/16/05, Jan-Benedict Glaw <jbglaw at lug-owl.de> wrote:
> > 
> > > Some days ago, 2.95.x was somewhat abondoned, so new features _only_
> > > supported by newer GCC versions are okay to use right now, without
> > > checking.
> > 
> > Is this an official position of the uClibc project? I am still using
> > gcc 2.95.2 with no problems BTW.
> 
> The position of uClibc's developers (with me not being an core uClibc
> developer, but tryin' to keep up with all the uClibc changes and being
> the VAX port maintainer) is irrelevant here.

yeah, i dont see what linux's position on gcc-2 has to do with uClibc
-mike



More information about the uClibc mailing list