busybox segfault in __uClibc_main

Rob Landley rob at landley.net
Sat Dec 3 03:57:49 UTC 2005


On Friday 02 December 2005 11:25, Linh Dang wrote:
> >I believe busybox 1.01 is still doing a (highly questionable)
> > reorganization of its arguments for purely aestehtic reasons, which was
> > yanked from -current some time ago.
> >
> >Could you try the SVN version (or 1.1-pre1) and see if that works for you?
> >
> >Rob
>
> Thanx Rob,
>
> with 1.1-pre1 it would segfault at the same place when i run
>
>         busybox ls
>
> but ash wouldn't event start, it segfaulted right away.
>
> Is there a version of busybox that would work with uClibc?

I'm using busybox with uClibc.  I think the imporant part here is busybox on 
ppc.

I'd like to track this down, can you email me an strace of the segfaulting 
cases you've found?  (And you've confirmed that a simple "hello world" 
program works fine with your uclibc toolchain, right?)

Rob
-- 
Steve Ballmer: Innovation!  Inigo Montoya: You keep using that word.
I do not think it means what you think it means.



More information about the uClibc mailing list