[uClibc] [buildroot 0000175]: new package provided: monit

[Ned Ludd]

On Tue, 2005-04-05 at 08:15 +0200, Peter Kjellerstedt wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: uclibc-bounces at uclibc.org 
> > [mailto:uclibc-bounces at uclibc.org] On Behalf Of Rob Landley
> > Sent: Monday, April 04, 2005 11:51
> > To: uclibc at uclibc.org
> > Cc: bugs at busybox.net
> > Subject: Re: [uClibc] [buildroot 0000175]: new package provided: monit
> > 
> > Just a thought, but at what point does buildroot need its own 
> > mailing list?  (I use uclibc and busybox, but I don't use buildroot.
> > Nor do I use the uclibc based debian system.)
> 
> I can only second the motion for a separate buildroot list
> (and preferably a separate list for buildroot commits too).
[snip]

3rd the motion.

Erik would you mind making a separate list(s) for *buildroot* stuff
please?

I think quite a few people on this uClibc list such as vendors use other
build systems and the clutter caused from buildroot makes it somewhat
harder/undesirable to track whats going on in the uClibc world.

> > And a seperate posting each time somebody tweaks the bug report 
> > in any way so that on average each bug results in at least three 
> > posts to the list ("it's open", "somebody added a note", "it's 
> > closed"...) Since wednesday, we've been averaging as many of 
> > these subversion spams as we have actual posts...
> 
> Well, the problem is that you normally assign a person and not 
> a whole mailing list as the responsible for handling a bug report, 
> and under those circumstances, sending out these mails are 
> perfectly fine. But since Erik has decided to assign the mailing 
> list to each and every report, this is what we get. I can 
> understand why he has done it this way, as there is an apparent 
> risk that the reports would be forgotten if they were assigned 
> to individuals, but I am not sure this is a good idea. I believe
> there may be an even greater risk that they are forgotten in this 
> way, as there is no one responsible for each report.
> 
> If we are going to stay with the bug reports being assigned to the 
> entire uClibc community rather than individuals, I think we should
> create separate mailing lists for these mails too. Just like we
> have the separate commit lists for mails from subversion.
> 
> > Rob
> 
> //Peter
> _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> uClibc at uclibc.org
> http://uclibc.org/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
-- 
Ned Ludd <solar at gentoo.org>