[uClibc] sigprocmask issue

Peter S. Mazinger ps.m at gmx.net
Fri Oct 22 07:46:59 UTC 2004


On Fri, 22 Oct 2004, Erik Andersen wrote:

> On Fri Oct 22, 2004 at 08:45:32AM +0200, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> > Will then the arch specific sigprocmask take precedence over the one in 
> > common?
> 
> I do not see any arch specific 'sigprocmask' implementations.
> There are some entirely pointless looking weak '__sigprocmask'
> symbols for a few architectures, but those are weaks that appear
> to simply refer back to the common sigprocmask.c

Ok, you are right, I will "implement" __libc_sigprocmask, and use that for
those arch instead of the current usage.

Peter

-- 
Peter S. Mazinger <ps dot m at gmx dot net>           ID: 0xA5F059F2
Key fingerprint = 92A4 31E1 56BC 3D5A 2D08  BB6E C389 975E A5F0 59F2




More information about the uClibc mailing list