[uClibc] Re: crt unacceptable "fix" removal
Erik Andersen
andersen at codepoet.org
Fri Oct 15 22:05:38 UTC 2004
On Fri Oct 15, 2004 at 11:55:16PM +0200, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> True for cross environment, but not for a native uclibc env, where any of
> these are useless (they are already done)
You keep talking about cross vs native. I'm not certain that I
understand why. If you are building uClibc on a native uClibc
system, typical usage would be the same, except skipping the
parts about binutils and gcc:
1) build uClibc
2) install uClibc
3) build uClibc utils
4) install uClibc utils
> The only thing is: update uClibc and the utils. What remains is:
> package twice, once build uClibc w/ utils and package/install, after that
> build only utils, package/install
Would it be simpler if the utils were split out into an entirely
separate package? They are effectively separate already.
-Erik
--
Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
More information about the uClibc
mailing list