[uClibc] unresolved dependency on "pow()" in libfetish.a (coreutils)

Manuel Novoa III mjn3 at codepoet.org
Sat May 29 03:08:07 UTC 2004


On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 03:23:17AM +0200, Robert Urban wrote:
> Is there any reason not to substitute openssl-0.9.7d for 0.9.7c?  Can I
> reasonably expect things to work afterwards?

What are you talking about?  If you're talking about buildroot, then
build/openssl.mk is already using openssl-0.9.7d.

Manuel



More information about the uClibc mailing list