On Sat, May 29, 2004 at 03:23:17AM +0200, Robert Urban wrote: > Is there any reason not to substitute openssl-0.9.7d for 0.9.7c? Can I > reasonably expect things to work afterwards? What are you talking about? If you're talking about buildroot, then build/openssl.mk is already using openssl-0.9.7d. Manuel