[uClibc] LD_LIBRARY_PATH problem

Erik Andersen andersen at codepoet.org
Fri Mar 12 01:14:01 UTC 2004


On Thu Mar 11, 2004 at 12:31:04AM +0100, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> The earlier one had the example, here it comes again
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH="$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:." does not work if 
> LD_LIBRARY_PATH is empty/haven't tested if it is set, can't load lib from
> local dir), glibc tolerates that.

Ok, I've now tried it and I do not see the problem you describe.
As with the 'install' problem you have mentioned several times
now, the ball is on your side of the court.  Could you provide
a better example (Or a non-corrupt strace)?  Or have I perhaps
mis-understood the problem?
 
# echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH

# ldd /bin/echo
        libc.so.0 => /lib/libc.so.0 (0x40008000)
        ld-uClibc.so.0 => /lib/ld-uClibc.so.0 (0x40000000)
# /bin/echo "hi"
hi
# LD_LIBRARY_PATH="$LD_LIBRARY_PATH:."
# echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
:.
# /bin/echo "hi"
hi

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--



More information about the uClibc mailing list