[uClibc] gcc-3.3.2 building problem

Manuel Novoa III mjn3 at codepoet.org
Thu Jan 29 04:56:20 UTC 2004


Hello Peter,

On Wed, Jan 28, 2004 at 06:00:12PM +0100, Peter S. Mazinger wrote:
> On Sun, 25 Jan 2004, Manuel Novoa III wrote:
> 
> > The config.guess stuff is a related issue.  I'd like to hear pros
> > and cons for including some uClibc configuration info in the tuple
> > name itself.  And, as I've mentioned to Rob, if we do decide to
> > include info in the tuple name then I would prefer that we control
> > the exported info via some define in uClibc_config.h rather than
> > encoding checks in the config.guess script.  That way, we avoid
> > having to again change things upstream if we decide to make internal
> > changes.
> 
> What about having only one config option, let's call it 
> UCLIBC_CONFIG_VERSION, LIBC defaults to uclibc (like in the config.guess 
> patch), and if the above option is present, then it is appended to uclibc.
> I have made a diff between automake-1.7's config.guess and current, using 
> the posted patch, modified accordingly (I've also added a check for
> $LIBC != "gnulibc1", I think that would be needed too)
> 

That's along the lines of what I was thinking.  I'll look at it later
this week or this weekend when I clear some time.

Manuel



More information about the uClibc mailing list