[uClibc] Re: uclibc and heap randomisation (ET_EXEC)
Mike Frysinger
vapier at gentoo.org
Mon Aug 30 17:41:38 UTC 2004
On Monday 30 August 2004 11:44 am, Joakim Tjernlund wrote:
> Hmm, I removed that code by mistake and that broke procps.
it also silently killed Gentoo's sandbox ... there is the fact that our
current sandbox implementation is an ugly beast, but there is also the fact
that it works fine with this code ...
theres also the question of what else broke and no one noticed :) that bit of
code seems to provide something vital; but what exactly ? i have no idea
because these details are way above my head :)
-mike
More information about the uClibc
mailing list