ready for the desktop? was: Re: [uClibc] Re: uClibc 0.9.22 released
Rogelio M.Serrano Jr.
rogelio at smsglobal.net
Tue Nov 11 02:09:34 UTC 2003
I installed gnu gettext in my uclibc build myself but i end up with
two libintl*.so. Is
that ok?
On 2003-11-11 09:03:00 +0800 Manuel Novoa III <mjn3 at codepoet.org>
wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2003 at 06:46:11PM -0600, TxRx Lists wrote:
>> Rob Landley wrote:
>>
>>> That said, the traffic doesn't necessarily justify it yet. Chick
>>> and egg
>>> >problem. I'm not quite sure how far away is considered "on topic"
>>> here...
>>
>> I build my own task specific mini distro with uClibc (a short cut to
>> booting Freevo from a 32MB CF) and it really wasn't that hard - even
>> working around that nasty dynamic library bug. The only problems I
>> encounted compiling all kinds of things were locale and wordexp()
>> related,
>> but those issues are mostly gone now, I bet. There's a guy with a
>> page up
>> documenting his quest to compile Gentoo against uClibc :-)
>
> As you say, the dlopen() bug remains.
>
> One other stumbling block is gettext() support, which is on my todo
> list for this month. When building his uClibc-based debian system,
> Erik had to hack a lot of packages that assumed gettext support was
> part of libc.
>
> Manuel
> _______________________________________________
> uClibc mailing list
> uClibc at uclibc.org
> http://uclibc.org/mailman/listinfo/uclibc
>
More information about the uClibc
mailing list