[uClibc]Re: New uClibc Configuration System

Miles Bader miles at lsi.nec.co.jp
Tue Nov 5 08:06:49 UTC 2002


BTW, do the names of the config options follow any consistent naming
scheme?  There seem to be a bewildering variety of them, e.g.,
UCLIBC_... HAVE_/HAS_... DO... ARCH_.... <no prefix>...

My quick guess is UCLIBC_... is for stuff that gets defined in
bits/uClibc_config.h, DO... is somehow for makefile stuff,
ARCH_... seems to be for internal communication from the arch-specific
config file to the generic one(?), <no prefix> stuff is just random (I
guess mostly for makefiles).

-Miles
-- 
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.



More information about the uClibc mailing list