[uClibc]Re: New uClibc Configuration System
Miles Bader
miles at lsi.nec.co.jp
Tue Nov 5 08:06:49 UTC 2002
BTW, do the names of the config options follow any consistent naming
scheme? There seem to be a bewildering variety of them, e.g.,
UCLIBC_... HAVE_/HAS_... DO... ARCH_.... <no prefix>...
My quick guess is UCLIBC_... is for stuff that gets defined in
bits/uClibc_config.h, DO... is somehow for makefile stuff,
ARCH_... seems to be for internal communication from the arch-specific
config file to the generic one(?), <no prefix> stuff is just random (I
guess mostly for makefiles).
-Miles
--
Quidquid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
More information about the uClibc
mailing list