[uClibc]Re: __NR_* definitions

[Erik Andersen]

On Tue Mar 12, 2002 at 10:41:19AM +0900, Miles Bader wrote:
> 
> What's the point in including code `needed for libc5' in uClibc?!
> [or is the comment misleading?]

Nah.  This is just on the wrong list.  Its a change to the
BusyBox libc5 compat code that was getting accidentally triggered
by uClibc.

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--