[uClibc]execve segfaults

Erik Andersen andersen at codepoet.org
Wed Jun 26 20:02:07 UTC 2002


On Wed Jun 26, 2002 at 05:21:05PM +0200, Ronald Wahl wrote:
> On 26 Jun 2002 14:55:46 +0200, Ronald Wahl wrote:
> 
> > The shell used to execute this is a busybox-0.60.3 (statically linked
> > against uClibc-0.9.12). The 'date' command is symlinked to a
> > busybox-0.60.3 that was dynamically linked against uClibc-0.9.12.
> 
> I did some further tests where I used a bash instead of busybox as
> shell for the tests. The result was the same. So I think busybox is not
> involved into the problem.

You mention you are using kernel 2.4.2....  That really is quite
ancient at this point.  Is there any chance you could use
something reasonably current, like 2.4.18 or 2.4.19-rc1 to verify
if the problem is still present?

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--



More information about the uClibc mailing list