[uClibc]How to make a v850(e)-elf cross compiler from the gcc3.2-uclibc-toolchain

Anders Boegild sredna at mip.sdu.dk
Sun Dec 15 23:02:08 UTC 2002


Miles Bader wrote:

>I usually don't use straight FSF distributions of gcc, but rather
>v850e-specific `gnupro' distributions. 
>
Sounds interessting! I wasn't aware that there were other distro's than 
FSF's (except EGCS wich seem to be abandoned)
Where can I find these v850e-specific distributions?

>It _may_ be that you just need a newer version of config.sub with `v850e'
>in it (that was true of a recent binutils release: it supported v850e just
>fine, but config.sub didn't know it).  If this is the case, you can
>probably just fix config.sub yourself by finding the place it mentions
>`v850' and adding `v850e' in the obvious manner.
>
YES! that worked.

>Perhaps it would be easier to use a v850e-specific distribution of gcc;
>I've got some I thing I can put up on a web-site.
>
That would be nice :o)


Even though I can compile a crosscompiler with newlib, I would still 
like to try uClibc so I've downloaded the latest uClibc toolchain from 
the CVS but I can't compile it because the  linux/include/asm-v850 
directory seems to be missing from the kernel-headers. (actually 
asm-v850nommu, since I've set HAS_MMU:=false in the toolchain's 
Makefile)  The CVS changelog have some mentions of the directory, but I 
can't make any sense of it -perhaps the asm-v850 directory was in the 
previous version of the kernel-headers...
Do you use the kernel-headers when compiling uClibc?

Regards
Anders -denmark




More information about the uClibc mailing list