[uClibc]How to make a v850(e)-elf cross compiler from the gcc3.2-uclibc-toolchain
Anders Boegild
sredna at mip.sdu.dk
Sun Dec 15 23:02:08 UTC 2002
Miles Bader wrote:
>I usually don't use straight FSF distributions of gcc, but rather
>v850e-specific `gnupro' distributions.
>
Sounds interessting! I wasn't aware that there were other distro's than
FSF's (except EGCS wich seem to be abandoned)
Where can I find these v850e-specific distributions?
>It _may_ be that you just need a newer version of config.sub with `v850e'
>in it (that was true of a recent binutils release: it supported v850e just
>fine, but config.sub didn't know it). If this is the case, you can
>probably just fix config.sub yourself by finding the place it mentions
>`v850' and adding `v850e' in the obvious manner.
>
YES! that worked.
>Perhaps it would be easier to use a v850e-specific distribution of gcc;
>I've got some I thing I can put up on a web-site.
>
That would be nice :o)
Even though I can compile a crosscompiler with newlib, I would still
like to try uClibc so I've downloaded the latest uClibc toolchain from
the CVS but I can't compile it because the linux/include/asm-v850
directory seems to be missing from the kernel-headers. (actually
asm-v850nommu, since I've set HAS_MMU:=false in the toolchain's
Makefile) The CVS changelog have some mentions of the directory, but I
can't make any sense of it -perhaps the asm-v850 directory was in the
previous version of the kernel-headers...
Do you use the kernel-headers when compiling uClibc?
Regards
Anders -denmark
More information about the uClibc
mailing list