[uClibc]uclibc-cvs breaks busybox df command
Erik Andersen
andersen at codepoet.org
Wed Aug 28 20:59:22 UTC 2002
On Wed Aug 28, 2002 at 01:33:12PM -0700, David Meggy wrote:
> I already have CONFIG_FPE_NWFPE=y selected. Actually without it, not
> even init works. At least couple of months ago init failed on me.
Hmmm. Puzzling. Busybox + uClibc0.9.15 is working just great
here on two strongArm systems (my netwinder and my tuxscreen).
For the netwinder, I built using Debian's gcc 2.95.4 with
binutils 2.12.90.0.1-4. For the tuxscreen I built using gcc 3.2
with binutils-2.12.1. Both work fine with Busybox+uClibc0.9.15.
Does 'cat /proc/cpu/alignment' change from before and after
you execute the busybox df? Does reverting to binutils-2.12.1
make any difference? I've had a bit of trouble with the newer
binutils-2.13 and I don't really trust it yet,
-Erik
--
Erik B. Andersen http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
More information about the uClibc
mailing list