[uClibc]bits/syscall[s].h

[Miles Bader]

I noticed that <bits/syscalls.h> (note the `s') now includes
<bits/syscall.h> (no s).

Is there a reason to have two header files that differ only in one
being plural and the other not?  It's likely to lead to confusion.

The comment in the code says that <bits/syscall.h> is to contain a list
of syscall numbers, whereas <bits/syscalls.h> is the `general interface
to syscalls' include file -- which seems completely backwards.

A more clear name for the list-of-syscal-numbers header file might be
something like <bits/sysnum.h> [by analogy with <sys/errnum.h> in glibc].

-Miles
-- 
Come now, if we were really planning to harm you, would we be waiting here, 
 beside the path, in the very darkest part of the forest?