[uClibc]Confusing uClibc messages

Erik Andersen andersen at codepoet.org
Sat Aug 24 06:00:45 UTC 2002


On Sat Aug 24, 2002 at 01:58:56AM -0400, Karim Yaghmour wrote:
> 
> I had been conducting tests with uClibc which involved quite a few
> steps. One of them was mounting a filesystem using BusyBox. Here's
> what was happening:
> # mount -t jffs2 /dev/mtdblock5 /mnt
> mount: Mounting /dev/mtdblock5 on /mnt failed: Bad address
> 
> No need to say that "Bad address" wasn't very informative. Especially
> since the kernel had JFFS2 support and both /dev/mtdblockX and /mnt
> existed on the rootfs.

Out of curiousity, which architecture were you testing?

 -Erik

--
Erik B. Andersen             http://codepoet-consulting.com/
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--



More information about the uClibc mailing list