[uClibc]Recent CVS changes
Erik Andersen
andersen at lineo.com
Tue May 22 17:26:19 UTC 2001
On Tue May 22, 2001 at 09:56:06AM -0500, Jon Nelson wrote:
> Why was the change made to default to malloc-simple?
> I had lots of trouble with malloc-simple.
> malloc-97whatever works great, but only on x86.
> malloc (no suffix) worked fine except for the free problem I encountered.
> What gives?
I think you are mistaken. CVS still tells me the default is malloc,
not malloc-simple. I am hoping to get time to look into the malloc
free issue Real Soon Now(tm).
-Erik
--
Erik B. Andersen email: andersen at lineo.com
--This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
More information about the uClibc
mailing list