[uClibc]tinylogin built vs. uClibc
Tom Cameron
TCameron at stmarysbank.com
Fri Feb 23 23:12:34 UTC 2001
Hello all,
When building TinyLogin, I chose to build vs. the uClibc libraries.
Obviously, it also uses the libcrypt library, but I was wondering why it
also uses libc (why bother use uClibc at all?), and ld-linux. When
compiling BusyBox, I do not see these (I only see libuClibc.so.1). Is this
due to the fact that libcrypt uses libc? If so, would re-compiling the
source for libcrypt vs. uClibc fix this? Below I have included the output
of an ldd of tinylogin. Thanks for all your help!
### Begin Output ###
[root at lfs bin]# ldd tinylogin
libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/libcrypt.so.1 (0x4000c000)
libuClibc.so.1 => /lib/libuClibc.so.1 (0x40039000)
libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40067000)
ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4014d000)
### End Output ###
--
Thomas Cameron
Network Technician / Operations Specialist
St. Mary's Bank
More information about the uClibc
mailing list