[uClibc]tinylogin built vs. uClibc

[Tom Cameron]

Hello all,
	When building TinyLogin, I chose to build vs. the uClibc libraries.
Obviously, it also uses the libcrypt library, but I was wondering why it
also uses libc (why bother use uClibc at all?), and ld-linux.  When
compiling BusyBox, I do not see these (I only see libuClibc.so.1).  Is this
due to the fact that libcrypt uses libc?  If so, would re-compiling the
source for libcrypt vs. uClibc fix this?  Below I have included the output
of an ldd of tinylogin.  Thanks for all your help!

### Begin Output ###

[root at lfs bin]# ldd tinylogin
        libcrypt.so.1 => /lib/libcrypt.so.1 (0x4000c000)
        libuClibc.so.1 => /lib/libuClibc.so.1 (0x40039000)
        libc.so.6 => /lib/libc.so.6 (0x40067000)
        ld-linux.so.2 => /lib/ld-linux.so.2 (0x4014d000)

### End Output ###

--
Thomas Cameron
Network Technician / Operations Specialist
St. Mary's Bank