[git commit nptl_glibc_sync] Get new nptl building on SH4

[Salvatore CRO']

Khem Raj wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Salvatore CRO' <salvatore.cro at st.com> wrote:
>   
>> Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>>     
>>> On 2/20/2010 4:25 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>
>>>       
>>>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
>>>> <carmelo.amoroso at st.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>         
>>>>> On 2/10/2010 3:24 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>> commit:
>>>>>> http://git.uclibc.org/uClibc/commit/?id=ed0915ba70d0ff6ed0a78f45d46822763a580737
>>>>>> branch:
>>>>>> http://git.uclibc.org/uClibc/commit/?id=refs/heads/nptl_glibc_sync
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>> Hi Khem,
>>>>> I have limited capabilities to contribute currently due to a healthy
>>>>> issue at my shoulder, I'll ask some engineers in my team to do a lot of
>>>>> tests on sh4.
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>> thanks Carmelo. is it booting on sh yet or not ?
>>>>
>>>>         
>>> not yet tested... I'll let you know.
>>>
>>> carmelo
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> uClibc-cvs mailing list
>>> uClibc-cvs at uclibc.org
>>> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc-cvs
>>>
>>>       
>> Hi Khem, Carmelo,
>> I gave a boot on 7111 ST soc after building this branch and seems ok. I also
>> did few (uClibc) testing with no issues.
>>     
>
> Great. Did the regression tests work well too ?
>
>   
>> Salvo.
>>
>>     
Whole uClibc test suite done on sh with no regressions.

Salvo.