[git commit nptl_glibc_sync] Get new nptl building on SH4

Khem Raj raj.khem at gmail.com
Mon Feb 22 17:47:03 UTC 2010


On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 3:03 AM, Salvatore CRO' <salvatore.cro at st.com> wrote:
> Carmelo AMOROSO wrote:
>>
>> On 2/20/2010 4:25 AM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 12:18 AM, Carmelo AMOROSO
>>> <carmelo.amoroso at st.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 2/10/2010 3:24 PM, Khem Raj wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> commit:
>>>>> http://git.uclibc.org/uClibc/commit/?id=ed0915ba70d0ff6ed0a78f45d46822763a580737
>>>>> branch:
>>>>> http://git.uclibc.org/uClibc/commit/?id=refs/heads/nptl_glibc_sync
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Khem Raj <raj.khem at gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Hi Khem,
>>>> I have limited capabilities to contribute currently due to a healthy
>>>> issue at my shoulder, I'll ask some engineers in my team to do a lot of
>>>> tests on sh4.
>>>>
>>>
>>> thanks Carmelo. is it booting on sh yet or not ?
>>>
>>
>> not yet tested... I'll let you know.
>>
>> carmelo
>> _______________________________________________
>> uClibc-cvs mailing list
>> uClibc-cvs at uclibc.org
>> http://lists.busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/uclibc-cvs
>>
>
> Hi Khem, Carmelo,
> I gave a boot on 7111 ST soc after building this branch and seems ok. I also
> did few (uClibc) testing with no issues.

Great. Did the regression tests work well too ?

>
> Salvo.
>


More information about the uClibc-cvs mailing list