Agreed, we use squashfs for our rootfilesystem to save space on
everything. However, I could see this being a useful alternative,
for those who need a writable rootfilesystem, can't/won't use unionfs.<br>
<br>
I think the differentiation between a failed unzip and an uncompressed
file could use some work though. Although, I guess if it fails,
it fails and your system won't work as expected either way. A
differentiating error code or message might help in debugging the
problem though.<br>
<br>
<br><br><div><span class="gmail_quote">On 8/16/05, <b class="gmail_sendername">Rob Landley</b> <<a href="mailto:rob@landley.net">rob@landley.net</a>> wrote:</span><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
On Tuesday 16 August 2005 10:41, Stephen Warren wrote:<br><br>Or you could use a compressed filesystem like squashfs...<br><br>I personally have no strong opinion either way...<br><br>Rob<br><br><br>_______________________________________________
<br>busybox mailing list<br><a href="mailto:busybox@mail.busybox.net">busybox@mail.busybox.net</a><br><a href="http://busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox">http://busybox.net/mailman/listinfo/busybox</a><br><br><br></blockquote>
</div><br>