[PATCH 1/2] allow honouring libc provided SIGRTMIN/SIGRTMAX

[Rasmus Villemoes]

On 2018-10-05 09:08, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> On 2018-09-12 16:06, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
>> When an application documents that it responds such and such to
>> SIGRTMIN+n, that almost always means with respect to the libc-provided
>> SIGRTMIN. Hence I disagree with the "more correct" in commit
>> 7b276fc17594. In any case, this is rather unfortunate:
>>
>> # kill -l RTMIN+2
>> 36
>> # busybox kill -l RTMIN+2
>> 34
>>
>> (the first shell is bash). We probably can't change default behaviour
>> after 7 years, but at least we can provide a config option.
> 
> ping

ping2