[PATCH 5/5] Bionic lacks transparent LFS migrations; provide a workaround

Denys Vlasenko vda.linux at googlemail.com
Sun May 3 16:47:30 UTC 2015


On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 8:36 AM,  <dietmar.schindler at manroland-web.com> wrote:
> Whose policy is that which caters to a certain compiler option's inept warnings? "What are the goals of Busybox?" (http://www.busybox.net/FAQ.html#goals) says: "We also want to have the simplest and cleanest implementation we can manage..." - I wouldn't say that
>
> #if defined(__BIONIC__) && defined(_FILE_OFFSET_BITS) && _FILE_OFFSET_BITS == 64
>
> is as simple and clean as
>
> #if defined(__BIONIC__) && _FILE_OFFSET_BITS == 64

But the former lets compiler catch a typo...


More information about the busybox mailing list