ntpd daemon

Isaac Dunham ibid.ag at gmail.com
Thu Mar 5 00:19:06 UTC 2015


On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:05:06PM +0000, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> Better, thanks, but the documentation would still not mention the case of
> abort.
> 
> On Tuesday, March 3, 2015, Isaac Dunham <ibid.ag at gmail.com> wrote:
> > How is this patch for clarifying the documentation?

> > //usage:       )
> >+//usage:     "\n               If no peer is defined, ntpd will not run"
> > //usage:       IF_FEATURE_NTPD_SERVER(
> >+//usage:     "\n               unless ntpd is running as a server (-l)"
<snip>

Are you sure?
I didn't use the word "abort", but it seemed to me that "if no peer
is defined, ntpd will not run" should make the behavior clear.

Thanks,
Isaac Dunham


More information about the busybox mailing list