ntpd daemon
Isaac Dunham
ibid.ag at gmail.com
Thu Mar 5 00:19:06 UTC 2015
On Wed, Mar 04, 2015 at 10:05:06PM +0000, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> Better, thanks, but the documentation would still not mention the case of
> abort.
>
> On Tuesday, March 3, 2015, Isaac Dunham <ibid.ag at gmail.com> wrote:
> > How is this patch for clarifying the documentation?
> > //usage: )
> >+//usage: "\n If no peer is defined, ntpd will not run"
> > //usage: IF_FEATURE_NTPD_SERVER(
> >+//usage: "\n unless ntpd is running as a server (-l)"
<snip>
Are you sure?
I didn't use the word "abort", but it seemed to me that "if no peer
is defined, ntpd will not run" should make the behavior clear.
Thanks,
Isaac Dunham
More information about the busybox
mailing list