[PATCH] taskset: support more than 64 cores

[Aaro Koskinen]

Hi,

On Mon, Aug 11, 2014 at 02:25:04PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> I wonder about the use case for this feature? I mean busybox is meant for
> small systems in general, and >=64 cores are not that small embedded
> systems, at least not yet, yeah?

How you define small? Earlier you said using libc getconf is bloat
(as nproc replacement) for multicore systems, but now you suggest
that for cores > 64 we should't care. Where do you draw the line?

Embedded systems that have lots of RAM and CPUs/cores run-time may be
still limited to having a boot flash of just few megs where the whole
OS image needs to fit.

A.