[PATCH] nproc: new applet

Laszlo Papp lpapp at kde.org
Mon Aug 4 22:22:13 UTC 2014


On Mon, Aug 4, 2014 at 11:19 PM, Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen at iki.fi> wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Aug 04, 2014 at 09:51:50PM +0100, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> > Glibc is out of the question, naturally. What would matter is eglibc
> > if one can verify it.
>
> What you mean? According to EGLIBC home page: "EGLIBC is no longer
> developed and such goals are now being addressed directly in GLIBC."
>

I am not sure what is unclear. eglibc is eglibc. Yes, they merged lately,
yet, Yocto, et all uses eglibc out there. That would be the most important
to verify. In fact, you will not have a full blown glibc on the target for
good when you only have 4 MB or 8 MB.

The bloatware measures also look good to me from the OP, so why being
blocker here anyway?

Cheers, L.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/attachments/20140804/bda87487/attachment.html>


More information about the busybox mailing list