Build doesn't fail if od not installed
Denys Vlasenko
vda.linux at googlemail.com
Thu Sep 16 21:31:32 UTC 2010
On Thursday 16 September 2010 14:52, walter harms wrote:
>
> Harald Becker schrieb:
> > Hi!
> >> NTL the main problem here is that the missing "od" is detected but the script
> >> is continuing only to fail otherwise.
> > True. That's the topic, I'm not complaining about if od is required or
> > not. Just that the build succeeded and didn't just abort at that point,
> > with a possible command not found message from make/shell. I don't
> > expect any error handling. Just abort and say failure ... and not
> > success ... resulting in confusion, when busybox fails with a
> > segmentation fault when just doing a xxx --help ... which let to hours
> > of searching for what has gone wrong :-(
> >
>
> I just want to clear that there are two problems.
>
> 1. check that every think is there what is need to compile bb
> 2. what to do if something is found missing
>
> my idea is to have a script like
>
> which --version >/dev/null || { echo "i need which" ; exit ; }
> for CMD in od
> do
> which $CMD || { echo "i need $CMD" ; exit ; }
> done
>
> this can be executed manually and its done. I guess that is what denis had
> in mind.
Not really, the fix looks like this:
applets/usage_compressed:
# Some people were bitten by their system lacking a (proper) od
od -v -t x1 </dev/null >/dev/null
if test $? != 0; then
echo 'od tool is not installed or cannot accept "-v -t x1" options'
exit 1
fi
That is, I check od availability before I'm going to use it in
applets/usage_compressed script.
--
vda
More information about the busybox
mailing list