fbsplash behaviour change since 1.13.4
Nuno Lucas
ntlucas at gmail.com
Mon Mar 8 18:06:17 UTC 2010
Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:32:07AM +0000, Nuno Lucas wrote:
>> Is this intentional? It makes sense for me because I don't need to have
>
> I was intentional for PPMs that are too big. I aggree that it makes sense
> to allow smaller images. Patches are welcome (see log below).
Thanks. I will look into submitting a patch then.
Regards,
~Nuno Lucas
>> different images for different frame buffer sizes (and I only want a small logo
>> with a progress bar to appear).
>
> $ git log 7307e06122997f3d5e0108cd1bab4b11a1d5ebdc^..7307e06122997f3d5e0108cd1bab4b11a1d5ebdc miscutils/fbsplash.c
> commit 7307e06122997f3d5e0108cd1bab4b11a1d5ebdc
> Author: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> Date: Wed Feb 18 15:28:43 2009 +0000
>
> - bail out if screen resolution does not match PPM dimensions.
> Previously a 640x480 PPM on an e.g. 720x400 console would just segfault when
> reading the lines. While this bug should perhaps be fixed to handle such cases
> properly we just exit gracefully until somebody is willing to take care of it
> properly.
More information about the busybox
mailing list