fbsplash behaviour change since 1.13.4

Nuno Lucas ntlucas at gmail.com
Mon Mar 8 18:06:17 UTC 2010


Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 05, 2010 at 11:32:07AM +0000, Nuno Lucas wrote:
>> Is this intentional? It makes sense for me because I don't need to have
> 
> I was intentional for PPMs that are too big. I aggree that it makes sense
> to allow smaller images. Patches are welcome (see log below).

Thanks. I will look into submitting a patch then.


Regards,
~Nuno Lucas

>> different images for different frame buffer sizes (and I only want a small logo
>> with a progress bar to appear).
> 
> $ git log 7307e06122997f3d5e0108cd1bab4b11a1d5ebdc^..7307e06122997f3d5e0108cd1bab4b11a1d5ebdc miscutils/fbsplash.c
> commit 7307e06122997f3d5e0108cd1bab4b11a1d5ebdc
> Author: Bernhard Reutner-Fischer
> Date:   Wed Feb 18 15:28:43 2009 +0000
> 
>     - bail out if screen resolution does not match PPM dimensions.
>       Previously a 640x480 PPM on an e.g. 720x400 console would just segfault when
>       reading the lines. While this bug should perhaps be fixed to handle such cases
>       properly we just exit gracefully until somebody is willing to take care of it
>       properly.




More information about the busybox mailing list