Fix for missing total blocks when using -l with ls

Cathey, Jim jcathey at ciena.com
Thu Oct 1 15:51:20 UTC 2009


>I had some software that used ls -l and expected the total blocks
>to be on the first line of the output from ls.

That's a new one on me.  Is that some kind of BSD
or GNU extension?  I'm not really in favor of it
doing a 'du' job as well.

-- Jim






More information about the busybox mailing list