older bug reports

Rob Landley rob at landley.net
Thu Nov 5 20:14:20 UTC 2009


On Tuesday 03 November 2009 21:48:22 Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> On Tuesday 03 November 2009 11:38, Cristian Zamfir wrote:
> > On Nov 2, 2009, at 11:37 PM, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> > > On Monday 02 November 2009 12:55:52 Cristian Zamfir wrote:
> > >> I have been trying to find some bug reports from July-August 2008.
> > >> For instance, bug http://bugs.busybox.net/view.php?id=4544 that is
> > >> described here
> > >> http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/2008-August/
> > >> 066760.html , but
> > >> also some older bugs.
> > >> Unfortunately, it seems that those bug reports are no longer
> > >> available
> > >> in Bugzilla, the oldest bug is from December 2008.
> > >> Is it still possible to access those bug reports?
> > >
> > > the mantis db was semi-lost during the upgrade.  some people (people
> > > who have
> > > access to the actual busybox hosting) have private copies of the old
> > > db, but i
> > > dont believe there are any public places.
> > > -mike
> >
> > If it is not a big hassle, it would be great if I can take a look at
> > such a private copy of the db. At least the part of the db that has
> > entries from July-August 2008. I would like to take a look at these
> > bugs for my research.
>
> There were only about 40 open bugs against bbox.
>
> Khem Raj might have it.

http://landley.net/mantis/

That was a quick and dirty "call wget a lot to fetch static pages" with a sed 
to clean up the local links.  I didn't get any of the attachments.

Rob
-- 
Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds


More information about the busybox mailing list