btrfs

Vladimir Dronnikov dronnikov at gmail.com
Mon Nov 2 12:04:22 UTC 2009


>>> util-linux/volume_id/btrfs.c:32: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before '__le64'
>
> That's why using uintNN_t is preferred. Those are standard types.
> They will always work.

I see.

>
> I wonder why kernel uses __u32 etc instead, with no sign
> of gradual migration to uint32_t?
> (I understand le/be types, but not this one).
>

They seem to jongling types freely: one type for kernel, one or two
for userspace utils...
That's another reason to come to the least common denominator -- a BB applet :)

> --
> vda
>


More information about the busybox mailing list