btrfs
Vladimir Dronnikov
dronnikov at gmail.com
Mon Nov 2 12:04:22 UTC 2009
>>> util-linux/volume_id/btrfs.c:32: error: expected specifier-qualifier-list before '__le64'
>
> That's why using uintNN_t is preferred. Those are standard types.
> They will always work.
I see.
>
> I wonder why kernel uses __u32 etc instead, with no sign
> of gradual migration to uint32_t?
> (I understand le/be types, but not this one).
>
They seem to jongling types freely: one type for kernel, one or two
for userspace utils...
That's another reason to come to the least common denominator -- a BB applet :)
> --
> vda
>
More information about the busybox
mailing list