[PATCH] Updates on busybox POSIX compliance

[Rob Landley]

On Friday 19 June 2009 17:35:31 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Friday 19 June 2009 16:15:39 Rob Landley wrote:
> > I'll try to get you something by monday...
>
> it's been a while since i looked at testing frameworks.  last time i did,
> buildbot was the least crappy one out there.  are you using a real
> framework or a set of cronjobs + custom scripts ?  i'd def prefer to use
> something like buildbot which would allow people to plug in ...

Plug in what?  They don't have a login to the server I'm running it on.  (And 
if it's running the busybox test suite, presumably they can check in any tests 
they want and those would get run.)

Also, the testsuite would be run inside various qemu instances, on root 
filesystems only containing busybox built against uClibc for various hardware 
targets (arm, mips, sh4, ppc, x86, and x86_64 at the moment).  Presumably 
you're saying buildbot should be run inside these qemu instances...?  I'm not 
sure how it applies.

> -mike

Rob
-- 
Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds