[PATCH] Updates on busybox POSIX compliance

Rob Landley rob at landley.net
Fri Jun 19 20:15:39 UTC 2009


On Friday 19 June 2009 06:25:03 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> the machines that host the uclibc/busybox/etc... infrastructure (i.e.
> website/scm/etc...) are not suitable for anything other than that.  while
> running a buildbot daemon might be ok (we'd have to ask),
> building/compiling anything on them would not.  this would let us farm out
> the regression testing to random interested parties on the list ...
> -mike

We've got an 8-way server here that's already building nightly snapshots for 
Firmware Linux, I just have to clean it up a bit to make the build more 
granular, run the test suite and log the output, and set something up to 
upload results.

I.E. 90% done over here already, I'm just hip deep in something else at the 
moment that I need to clear so I can update the perl removal patches for the 
Linux kernel build to resubmit them ASAP so I don't miss another merge window.

I'll try to get you something by monday...

Rob
-- 
Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds


More information about the busybox mailing list