[PATCH] Updates on busybox POSIX compliance
Rob Landley
rob at landley.net
Fri Jun 19 20:15:39 UTC 2009
On Friday 19 June 2009 06:25:03 Mike Frysinger wrote:
> the machines that host the uclibc/busybox/etc... infrastructure (i.e.
> website/scm/etc...) are not suitable for anything other than that. while
> running a buildbot daemon might be ok (we'd have to ask),
> building/compiling anything on them would not. this would let us farm out
> the regression testing to random interested parties on the list ...
> -mike
We've got an 8-way server here that's already building nightly snapshots for
Firmware Linux, I just have to clean it up a bit to make the build more
granular, run the test suite and log the output, and set something up to
upload results.
I.E. 90% done over here already, I'm just hip deep in something else at the
moment that I need to clear so I can update the perl removal patches for the
Linux kernel build to resubmit them ASAP so I don't miss another merge window.
I'll try to get you something by monday...
Rob
--
Latency is more important than throughput. It's that simple. - Linus Torvalds
More information about the busybox
mailing list