[PATCH] sendmail: EHLO/HELO should use a domain
Vladimir Dronnikov
dronnikov at gmail.com
Thu Sep 25 13:02:13 UTC 2008
>
> It fixes this error that i currently get from postfix:
> 501 5.5.2 <natanael.copa?gmail.com>: Helo command rejected: Invalid name
Sorry, Natanael, why is the question mark in the middle of the name?!
if there is no attatchement then the input is converted to an
> "attatchment". Makes sense if you really want attatchment support as you
> then can treat all parts equally more or less.
You've got the idea. By treating all parts equally we reduce code size and
improve maintenance-ability.
That would be great. Support for attatchemnt is higly nonstandard and
> should be an configure option.
> ...
> Isn't that a job for the script/program that creates the message in
> first place? sendmails job is to send mails. not compose them, nor edit
> them.
That is why a zillion of loosely coded scripts are needed to just send an
email. I consider attachments support as a good intrinsic feature.
> 2) Plain '.' in message: message body needs to be analyzed and
> > mangled.
> ssmtp solves that by inserting an '.' in front of all lines starting
> with '.'
Not big deal, but the message IS then mangled.
And it is a pain to send cyrillic text in plain. What to do with that if
vanilla sendmail knew nothing beyond ASCII 0-127 chars?
> But why doesn't the remote end correctly process well-packed MIME
> > messages?!
> Because recepient is a stupid program. (gnats)
Can we somehow say them they are gNUTs :^)
I'd like to have a sendmail that just sends mail and don't bother whats
> in there.
Well, I'll make FEATURE_SENDMAIL_BE_DUMB then.
That said, I will try my best.
Regards,
--
Vladimir
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/attachments/20080925/d657b0c9/attachment-0002.htm
More information about the busybox
mailing list