[RFC] libm replacement for Busybox

[Vladimir Dronnikov]

>> Has anyone ever actually _needed_ to statically link libm but leave libc
>> dynamically linked?  Anyone?

Surely not me. Link critical tools statically (at least against /lib/*.so).
We hope linker should throw away redundant parts.
In either case the resulting static busybox should be smaller than dynamic
BB + libm.so. And if not the difference should not be dramatic.

So link critical tools statically.

Regards,
--
Vladimir
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.busybox.net/pipermail/busybox/attachments/20081021/90ab1025/attachment-0002.htm