[PATCH] support for -w in seq

Natanael Copa natanael.copa at gmail.com
Mon Nov 10 14:29:24 UTC 2008


On Mon, 2008-11-10 at 15:05 +0100, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 10, 2008 at 02:51:49PM +0100, Ralf Friedl wrote:
> >Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote:
> >> coreutils prints a final '\n', yes.
> >coreutils prints a final '\n', but this is '\n' and not the separator.
> 
> heh, that's why i said '\n' and not "separator" ;)
> 
> So a simple bb_putchar('\n') after the while would correct this for
> that 02 patchlet. Still, this would add ~127b for these two features
> which sounds a tad too much (I'd attempt <= 110 for both).
> Any takers?

I only need -w for now. could we commit -w only first?

-nc




More information about the busybox mailing list