[patch] fixes most error: Overlong line...

[Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn]

On Mon, 21 Jul 2008, Denys Vlasenko wrote:

> On Monday 21 July 2008 21:43, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> > ...and a little more.
>
> I personally don't see the value of following "tow spaces after
> the period" rule, but if you like it that way, so be it.

I don't mind either.  I observed mixed style.  What should it be?

> However, with current svn:
>
> # patch -p1 </tmp/Config.in.patch --dry-run
> patching file Config.in
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 21.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 130.
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 197.
> Hunk #4 FAILED at 227.
> Hunk #5 FAILED at 239.
> Hunk #6 FAILED at 398.
> Hunk #7 FAILED at 558.
> Hunk #8 FAILED at 589.
> Hunk #9 FAILED at 630.
> Hunk #10 FAILED at 689.
> Hunk #11 FAILED at 714.
> Hunk #12 FAILED at 782.
> Hunk #13 FAILED at 902.
> 13 out of 13 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Config.in.rej
> patching file Config.in
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 33.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 68.
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 100.
> Hunk #4 FAILED at 113.
> Hunk #5 FAILED at 165.
> Hunk #6 FAILED at 217.
> Hunk #7 FAILED at 242.
> Hunk #8 FAILED at 266.
> Hunk #9 FAILED at 307.
> Hunk #10 FAILED at 325.
> 10 out of 10 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Config.in.rej
> patching file Config.in
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 117.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 681.
> 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Config.in.rej
> patching file Config.in
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 23.
> Hunk #2 FAILED at 189.
> Hunk #3 FAILED at 200.
> Hunk #4 FAILED at 228.
> Hunk #5 FAILED at 327.
> Hunk #6 FAILED at 628.
> Hunk #7 FAILED at 775.
> Hunk #8 FAILED at 796.
> 8 out of 8 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file Config.in.rej
> patching file Config.in
> Hunk #1 FAILED at 26.
> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file Config.in.rej
> missing header for unified diff at line 422 of patch
> patching file Config.in
>
> something is wrong...

So it seems.  I'll rebase that tonight.


Cheers,

-- 
Cristian