ps and username size
Lombard, David N
dnlombar at ichips.intel.com
Thu Jan 10 19:19:50 UTC 2008
On Thu, Jan 10, 2008 at 11:17:42AM +0100, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> On Wed, 9 Jan 2008, Lombard, David N wrote:
>
> > Just to be sure, this doesn't guarantee unique output. An integer
> > string is a perfectly valid username, both on a full distro and
> > bb/uc (just tested both).
>
> Maybe a new ps option to force UIDs only instead of truncated
> usernames would sort out the confusion. How does this sound?
Is it really worth trying to deal with this? This was, after all,
fairly contrived.
If looking to provide compatibility w/ full versions of utilities, then
the proposed patch puts BB's ps in sync w/ the full procps release.
I'm happy enough with the current patch due to the consistency w/
procps; I was happier still with the full names and column shift, but
do understand that those trying to parse ps output are better served
with the effort to maintain column alignment.
--
David N. Lombard, Intel, Irvine, CA
I do not speak for Intel Corporation; all comments are strictly my own.
More information about the busybox
mailing list