procps/ps.c, svn r20930
Denis Vlasenko
vda.linux at googlemail.com
Sun Feb 3 22:02:31 UTC 2008
On Sunday 03 February 2008 11:36, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> Would this adjustment be appropriate?
> No point in calling get_cached_username twice?
Yes. Fixed. Thanks.
> I do understand this is work in progress, but currently, even if this new
> code in function func_user were enabled, it doesn't look like it would
> produce the aimed results, as the ps-lines are still produced somewhere
> around line 555.
thats "#else /* !ENABLE_DESKTOP */" part, which needs not be so compatible
with "standard" ps.
--
vda
More information about the busybox
mailing list