procps/ps.c, svn r20930

Denis Vlasenko vda.linux at googlemail.com
Sun Feb 3 22:02:31 UTC 2008


On Sunday 03 February 2008 11:36, Cristian Ionescu-Idbohrn wrote:
> Would this adjustment be appropriate?
> No point in calling get_cached_username twice?

Yes. Fixed. Thanks.

> I do understand this is work in progress, but currently, even if this new
> code in function func_user were enabled, it doesn't look like it would
> produce the aimed results, as the ps-lines are still produced somewhere
> around line 555.

thats "#else /* !ENABLE_DESKTOP */" part, which needs not be so compatible
with "standard" ps.
--
vda



More information about the busybox mailing list