RFC: remove lash?

Paul Fox pgf at brightstareng.com
Tue May 22 23:43:39 UTC 2007


 > >  It could make sense to remove hush if msh is a little bigger than
 > > hush and maintain lash in order to have a very very small shell for
 > > very tiny devices.
 > 
 > This will leave me without shell which is small enough to be understndable
 > by mere mortals yet capable of some advanced stuff (like if/then).

wasn't rob working on a new shell?  did he make it available
anywhere?  i only ask because it might be at least as capable as
lash at this point.

paul
=---------------------
 paul fox, pgf at brightstareng.com



More information about the busybox mailing list