RFC: remove lash?
Paul Fox
pgf at brightstareng.com
Tue May 22 23:43:39 UTC 2007
> > It could make sense to remove hush if msh is a little bigger than
> > hush and maintain lash in order to have a very very small shell for
> > very tiny devices.
>
> This will leave me without shell which is small enough to be understndable
> by mere mortals yet capable of some advanced stuff (like if/then).
wasn't rob working on a new shell? did he make it available
anywhere? i only ask because it might be at least as capable as
lash at this point.
paul
=---------------------
paul fox, pgf at brightstareng.com
More information about the busybox
mailing list