On Thursday 22 March 2007 21:49, Reeve Yang wrote: > If we change bb_common_bufsiz1 to 4096 as BUFSIZ, instead of BUFSIZ + > 1, would it be a better solution? No. The problem is not in the size, the problem is that we call setvbuf after stdout was already used for printf'ing by ash. This is a big no-no. -- vda