ifconfig problem of busybox 1.4.1?

[Reeve Yang]

If we change bb_common_bufsiz1 to 4096 as BUFSIZ, instead of BUFSIZ +
1, would it be a better solution?

On 3/22/07, Denis Vlasenko <vda.linux at googlemail.com> wrote:
> On Thursday 22 March 2007 20:14, Reeve Yang wrote:
> > I think the old behavior is "better" too. Actually I changed the
> > ifconfig.c back to ignor unknown parameters, and it works fine now.
> >
> > Another problem on version 1.4.1, is that, when you do "ls -lR",
> > segmentation fault happened. Is there any patch for it so far?
>
> Known problem, recently debugged & fixed in svn.
>
> Remove setvbuf() from ls_main() or stop compiling your shell
> with standalone option.
> --
> vda
>