ifconfig problem of busybox 1.4.1?

[Reeve Yang]

I think the old behavior is "better" too. Actually I changed the
ifconfig.c back to ignor unknown parameters, and it works fine now.

Another problem on version 1.4.1, is that, when you do "ls -lR",
segmentation fault happened. Is there any patch for it so far?

On 3/22/07, Jan Evert van Grootheest <Jan-Evert.van.Grootheest at vialis.nl> wrote:
> > If I run ifconfig command with "inet" parameter, I got
> > following message:
> >
> > fconfig eth0 inet 10.1.0.2
> > ifconfig: inet: Resolver Error 0 (no error)
> >
> > And the ip address is not added onto the interface. Does
> > anyone has clue what's going on here? On busybox 1.2.1 there
> > is no problem.
>
> Maybe you're confused with the /etc/network/interfaces syntax (iface
> eth0 inet dhcp)?
> Or the ip utility (-f inet)?
> AFAIK there is no inet keyword for ifconfig. Never was. I checked
> RHEL2.1 and Ubuntu feisty (pre-7.04).
>
> And scripts can be fixed...
>
> -- Jan Evert
>
> The information contained in this communication is confidential and may be legally privileged. It is intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to whom it is addressed and others authorised to receive it. If you are not the intended recipient you are hereby notified that any disclosure, copying, distribution or taking any action in reliance on the contents of this information is strictly prohibited and may be unlawful. Vialis is neither liable for the proper and complete transmission of the information contained in this communication nor for any delay in its receipt.
>
>