hush on NONMMU for active shell

Martinb_ARM_NOMMU_KISSDVD martinb at zeelandnet.nl
Tue Jun 5 21:48:05 UTC 2007


do you have paypal?
I'm not sure what a 2e handed kiss dvd player (dp-500 / dp-50x / dp-150x)
will do but cant be that expensive
I can try to bug some people to raise some funds but I'm not sure if you are
willing to accept this


anyway I think the only good test is a real device (with harddrive or nfs
mount)
Just let me know if I can try to arrange something

About the "tab completion bug" and the "backspace bug"
I did try to compile all older versions from 1.0 to 1.6 to find out when
this problem did start
then I realize that I did change from gcc-2.95.3 to gcc-3.4.3 !
and now I did found out that if I compile the 1.1.0 version with gcc-3.4.3
crosscompiler I have the same "tab completion bug"

so its a combination of 2 things (but still a bug imho)



-----Oorspronkelijk bericht-----
Van: busybox-bounces at busybox.net
[mailto:busybox-bounces at busybox.net]Namens Denis Vlasenko
Verzonden: dinsdag 5 juni 2007 23:20
Aan: busybox at busybox.net
CC: Bernhard Fischer
Onderwerp: Re: hush on NONMMU for active shell


On Tuesday 05 June 2007 01:09, Mike Frysinger wrote:
> On Saturday 02 June 2007, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 02, 2007 at 09:36:30PM +0200, Martinb_ARM_NOMMU_KISSDVD
wrote:
> > >Because lash is the only shell what works for me (telnet shell) and
hush
> > > is now almost as small as lash im trying to get hush working for
telnet
> > > shell
> > >
> > >but like all other versions its not working (for me)
> > >Its a bit hard to debug because if i use hush i cant telnet anymore
> >
> > Does msh work fine for you on that box? It's supposed to..
>
> msh works fine as a telnet shell
>
> it is also the only shell that will work on a no-mmu platform

I want to have NOMMU test environment. I really do.

I spent a few hours figuring out which architechture can be used for that.
I even built cross-compiling toolchain for blackfin:

# ls -ld *bfin*
drwxr-xr-x    8 root     root          408 Jun  5 20:21
binutils-2.17-bfin-uclinux
drwxr-xr-x   10 root     root          616 Jun  5 20:21
gcc-4.1.2-bfin-uclinux

and then realized that it seems that qemu doesn't support
blackfin (right?) - I cannot put it to use (nowhere to run the binaries).

Help. Which architecture from this list is NOMMU:

# ls -l
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root       905636 Jun  5 20:20 qemu
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root       390532 Jun  5 20:20 qemu-arm
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root       398724 Jun  5 20:20 qemu-armeb
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root       544356 Jun  5 20:20 qemu-i386
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root       102964 Jun  5 20:20 qemu-img
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root       471064 Jun  5 20:20 qemu-m68k
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root       511040 Jun  5 20:20 qemu-mips
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root       504768 Jun  5 20:20 qemu-mipsel
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root       477696 Jun  5 20:20 qemu-ppc
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root       519632 Jun  5 20:20 qemu-sparc
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root       608440 Jun  5 20:20 qemu-system-arm
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root       822020 Jun  5 20:20 qemu-system-mips
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root       820580 Jun  5 20:20 qemu-system-mipsel
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root       742324 Jun  5 20:20 qemu-system-ppc
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root       661068 Jun  5 20:20 qemu-system-sparc
-rwxr-xr-x    1 root     root      1080144 Jun  5 20:20 qemu-system-x86_64

And if you happen to have a ready-to-use qemu kernel/image,
that would be great as a starting point (known-working setup
I can start from).

I was trying to use one of several images at

http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/download.html

and they are all running just fine, but they seem to be all for MMU arches!
:)
--
vda
_______________________________________________
busybox mailing list
busybox at busybox.net
http://busybox.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/busybox




More information about the busybox mailing list