shell script variables

Denis Vlasenko vda.linux at googlemail.com
Mon Oct 30 00:36:29 UTC 2006


On Sunday 29 October 2006 22:37, extmaillist at linuxbox.cz wrote:
> Hi Denis,
> 
> but anyways, I've been using statically compiled bb for years, and I really started having problems just with this one patch I mentioned before, so is situation with glibc really that bad? 
> I mean, I don't really have problem starting using uClibc instead, but I'm just a bit afraid as I see it as quite big change. So is statically compiling to uClibc really safe? And is uClibc generally OK for production use? Is there something else I should be aware of? It's still kind of big surprise for me, as I'd much more expect glibc to be rock stable then uClibc.

I have several applications compiled agains uclibc. No problems.

If you desperately want static bbox against glibc - find out
a way to ifdef out --gc-sections, and send a patch.
--
vda



More information about the busybox mailing list