should include/bb_config.h really be in svn?

Denis Vlasenko vda.linux at googlemail.com
Wed Oct 11 20:29:00 UTC 2006


On Wednesday 11 October 2006 13:46, Natanael Copa wrote:
> I found out I should try to test the new build system to help you guys
> to shake out some bugs.
> 
> svn: Failed to add file 'include/bb_config.h': object of the same name
> already exists
> 
> bb_config.h seems to be a generated file. Should it really be in svn?

It is not generated. It's a band-aid to the fact that
CONFIG_xxx which depend on unselected CONFIG_xxx
do not get ENABLE_xxx defined at all, which is not
expected to happen...
--
vda



More information about the busybox mailing list