busybox compile error form ARM core???

[Rob Landley]

On Tuesday 30 May 2006 12:38 pm, Bernhard Fischer wrote:
> Could somebody enlighten me why we check for #ifdef __uClinux__ instead
> of __uClibc__ throughout busybox?
>
> Is this a bug/leftover from the old days or is this the proper way to
> look for uClibc?

It's a check for nommu.  See the most recent TODO change from me.

Rob
-- 
Never bet against the cheap plastic solution.