add standard vi formatting directives to all source files?

Robert P. J. Day rpjday at mindspring.com
Fri May 19 12:16:07 UTC 2006


On Fri, 19 May 2006, Bernhard Fischer wrote:

> On Thu, May 18, 2006 at 04:34:52PM -0400, Robert P. J. Day wrote:
> >On Fri, 19 May 2006, Glenn L. McGrath wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, 18 May 2006 09:48:57 -0400 (EDT)
> >> "Robert P. J. Day" <rpjday at mindspring.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> >   if this is the consensus, i can toss together a patch that adds that>
> >> > to all files that currently don't have it and send it offline to rob.
> >> > are there any objections?  is that content agreeable to everyone?
> >>
> >> Sounds good to me.
> >
> >um ... what part?  the emacs stuff at the bottom or the
> >single-line, bernhard-supplied vi line at the top?  perhaps someone
> >could be absolutely precise about what should go into these files.
>
> I vote for the single-line vi and for removing the emacs block :)

ok.  what i can do is create a separate patch for that that you can
simply apply in addition to the vi patch, and treat that as a single
svn commit.  does that work for you?

rday



More information about the busybox mailing list